Acceptance as a Key Attribute of Mentoring

I believe that one of the key attributes of mentors is acceptance of people.  But I also think it’s one of the trickiest and perhaps one of the most challenging. I’m generally pretty accepting of people, but how did this acceptance come about? How does one become accepting?  Thinking back to my childhood and early adulthood, I got a few clues.

I remember my Dad telling me stories about racial integration when I was growing up in West Virginia. Having grown up in the 1950s and 1960s this was a major event in the South, which included to some degree West Virginia where I grew up.  Dad told me about interactions he observed.  I sometimes wonder if these stories were actually meant to teach me and shape my attitudes. But perhaps my husband Kenneth put it best: “I wasn’t taught to hate.” His mom said: ”I forgot to teach you to be racist.”

I grew up in an era that didn’t seem to talk about gays and lesbians. The first gay people I remember were two of the cavers in the MIG Grotto at the University of Illinois-UC. One of the gay men and I were competing for the attention of the same TA in a course we were both taking. I found that hilarious and don’t remember thinking anything negative about him or his orientation. He was a friend.  This unthinking acceptance of his sexual orientation just seemed to be a part of me, but I really have no roots to trace this acceptance back to.

These examples of acceptance have played out in my mentoring too, in some way drawing a wide diversity of students to my lab.  I believe there is a relationship between diversity and acceptance and lack of acceptance may lead to failure of attempts to enhance diversity.  And acceptance isn’t just accepting people of different colored skin.  It’s accepting people with different attitudes and beliefs. My hypothesis is that enthusiasm draws people to my research group and acceptance and caring keep them in the group.

Rewards of Being a Mentor

Yesterday I did an interview on mentoring with Yadéeh Sawyer from the STEM Gateway Program.  She asked me an interesting question: “What are the most rewarding aspects of being a mentor?”.  My responses about the rewards of mentoring centered around seeing the mentee succeed at what they are doing.  I’ve watched students go from the very beginning of their research to presenting first-rate talks at regional and national meetings.  Most of this is their hard work, but I like to think that the encouragement I gave along the way helped make this happen.  I also find it rewarding to see their faces light up when they find out they’ve been awarded their first grant.  Probably most rewarding to me is the actual conversations with students and mentees.  It’s really fun to look at a set of data with a student and find the story the data are telling us.  We do this in my lab group in lab meeting.  This fall we’re going to tackle the Parashant data set, which contains data on microbes from a variety of caves and one mine, which are all very different.  The project was a survey that we were commissioned to do and thus didn’t start with a hypothesis in mind.  Watching the student-led discussion of different figures illustrating trends in the data is rewarding.  What starts as a discussion with a lot of dead ends and frustration, gradually begins to coalesce into a publishable study over time.  That warms the cockles of my heart and gives me the sense that mentoring is all worth it!

To all the amazing mentors out there–what do you find most rewarding?  Please share your thoughts by commenting on this post.

Understanding my mentoring style

I’ve been asked to give a talk this fall about my mentoring.  The purpose of this blog is to delve more deeply into my mentoring style and philosophy.  I’m hoping that folks that read the blog will interact with me about mentoring and their own thoughts.

In 2011 I gave a TEDxABQ talk about mentoring.  You can view it here:

This talk grew out of my thoughts about my failing physics in college as an undergraduate.  I was too young and naive at the time to recognize that it wasn’t a matter of how smart I was, but how much I was studying.  This failure caused me to abandon science and my desire to be a biospeleologist–kind of a dumb decision, but there you have it.  That was 1967. At the time, I saw no other option than to not pursue a career in science, for which one must pass physics.  I never forgot that dream, but it was the help of two mentors at the University of New Mexico, that boosted my confidence and guided my fulfilling my dream to study cave life 20 years after that initial failure.

Why did those two professors make such a difference?  The essential thing was that they believed that I could do it and saw the potential in me.  It seems so clear in retrospect, but it was anything but when I first started back to school.  I remember taking my undergraduate requirements back in the mid-1980s.  Biology was fun and I love inorganic chemistry.  But then came the dreaded math and physics.  Luckily you have to take a math placement test and after 20 years of no math I was placed in bonehead algebra.  Physics was another matter.  I still remember pounding the table in frustration over trying to understand the normal force.  What made the difference–two math and science nerds, Jim and Kenneth.  This stuff was second nature to them–they loved it!  AND, more importantly, they could think of other ways to explain the concepts to me.  First lesson–not everyone thinks the same way.  And, not everyone is good at explaining things.  So, lesson number one:  your chosen mentor needs insight into why something doesn’t make sense to you and how to change the focus slightly so that it crystallizes for you.

That’s it for today. More soon!

Dr. Di, the proud biospeleologist 🙂